Friday, June 24, 2005

Black capped Chickadee songs carry complex information

People's Daily Online -- Chickadee songs carry complex information: study
Les oiseaux sont beaucoup plus brillants qu'on l'a cru. Les petites mésanges communiquent entre elles par leur chant commun:
Chickadee songs carry complex information: study

The chirp of chickadees can convey complex information about predators, warning flock mates of danger, shows a study to be published on Friday's issue of journal Science.

The little black-capped songbird, which is common across much of the United States and Canada, uses subtle variations of its characteristic "chick-a-dee-dee" call to pass detailed information such as what and where the predator is and how dangerous it is.

For example, the more "dee" notes at the end of a call, the more dangerous the predator, biology Ph.D. student Christopher Templeton of the University of Washington and his colleges have found. Other acoustic techniques include the spacing and timing of notes.

The chickadee call can also bring in the birds to mount a coordinated defense to drive away the predator.

In the study, chickadee songs were recorded, analyzed by situation and on acoustic instruments, and played back to the birds to see how they reacted.

Thursday, June 23, 2005

High-Tech Pictures Reveal How Hummingbirds Hover

Science & Technology at Scientific American.com: High-Tech Pictures Reveal How Hummingbirds Hover
Les colibris sont fascinants...
June 23, 2005

High-Tech Pictures Reveal How Hummingbirds Hover

Hummingbirds are famous for their hovering ability, which lets them linger in front of flowers and feast on their nectar. But just how the creatures manage to stay aloft has intrigued researchers for years. New findings published this week in the journal Nature indicate that when it comes to flying, a hummingbird's style is halfway between that of a bird and an insect.
Previous investigations into the flight of the hummingbird had suggested that it could be employing the same mechanisms as insects, which often hover and dart in a manner similar to the birds. "But a hummingbird is a bird, with the physical structure of a bird and all of the related capabilities and limitations," explains Douglas Warrick of Oregon State University. "It is not an insect and it does not fly exactly like an insect." To unravel the hummingbird's aerial secrets, Warrick and his colleagues used a technique called digital particle imaging velocimitry (DPIV). Usually employed by engineers, DPIV uses microscopic particles of olive oil that are light enough to be moved to and fro by the slightest changes in air currents. As a pulsing laser illuminates the droplets for short periods of time, a camera captures them on film. From the resulting images, the scientists determined exactly how the bird's wings move the air around them.

The results indicate that hummingbirds get 25 percent of their lift capacity from the upstroke beating of their wings; the other 75 percent of the lift comes from each downstroke. Insects, in contrast, divide the work equally, getting 50 percent of the lift from each, and other types of birds rely solely on the downstrokes. "What the hummingbird has done is take the body and most of the limitations of the bird," Warrick says, "but tweaked it a little and used some of the aerodynamic tricks of an insect to gain hovering ability." --Sarah Graham

Monday, June 20, 2005

New Scientist Breaking News - Orgasms: a real turn-off for women

New Scientist Breaking News -
Orgasms: a real %u2018turn-off%u2019 for women

Orgasms: a real ‘turn-off’ for women
17:54 20 June 2005
NewScientist.com news service
Michael Le Page, Copenhagen
For women, it seems, sex is a big turn-off, reveals a brain scanning study. It shows that many areas of the brain switch off during the female orgasm - including those involved with emotion.

“At the moment of orgasm, women do not have any emotional feelings,” says Gert Holstege of the University of Groningen in the Netherlands.

His team recruited 13 healthy heterosexual women and their partners. The women were asked to lie with their heads in a PET scanner while the team compared their brain activity in four states: simply resting, faking an orgasm, having their clitoris stimulated by their partner’s fingers, and clitoral stimulation to the point of orgasm.

The results of the study are striking. As the women were stimulated, activity rose in one sensory part of the brain, called the primary somatosensory cortex, but fell in the amygdala and hippocampus, areas involved in alertness and anxiety. During orgasm, activity fell in many more areas of the brain, including the prefrontal cortex, compared with the resting state, Holstege told a meeting of the European Society for Human Reproduction and Development in Copenhagen on Monday.

In one sense the findings appear to confirm what is already known, that women cannot enjoy sex unless they are relaxed and free from worries and distractions. "Fear and anxiety levels have to go down for orgasm. Everyone knows this but we can see it happening in the brain," he explains.

Extraordinary behaviour

From an evolutionary point of view, it could be that the brain switches off the emotions during sex because at such times the chance to produce offspring becomes more important than the survival risk to the individual. Holstege points to the extraordinary behaviour seen in some animals during the breeding season, such as March hares, when the urge to mate seems to override the usual fear of predators.

But Holstege cannot explain why there is such extreme deactivation in so many areas of the brain during orgasm. Only one small part of the brain, in the cerebellum, was more active during female orgasm. The cerebellum is normally associated with coordinating movement, though there is also some evidence that it helps regulate emotions. “We don’t know what activation of the cerebellum corresponds to,” Holstege admits.

His study also revealed clear differences when women were faking an orgasm. Part of the brain involved controlling conscious movement lit up, and there was none of the extreme deactivation.

Next the team hope to look at what happens to the brain in the minutes after orgasm, as well as in patients with sexual problems. The team has already done a similar study involving 11 men, which revealed far less deactivation during orgasm than in women. However, Holstege says the results are probably unreliable and need to be repeated. The problem is that PET scanners measure activity over two minutes - and in men it is all over in a few seconds.

Wednesday, June 15, 2005

New Scientist Breaking News - Sunny lifestyles may halve prostate cancer risk

New Scientist Breaking News - Sunny lifestyles may halve prostate cancer risk
Sunny lifestyles may halve prostate cancer risk
05:00 15 June 2005
NewScientist.com news service
Anna Gosline
A healthy dose of daily sunshine could chop the risk of prostate cancer in half, suggests the largest study so far on UV exposure, vitamin D and prostate cancer risk.

“Up until now the only things we knew about prostate cancer were things you can’t change: being old, being black and living in northern latitudes,” says Gary Schwartz at Wake Forest University in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, one of the research team.

Back in 1990, Schwartz noticed that people at a high risk of prostate cancer were similar to people at risk for vitamin D deficiency: they often lived in northern latitudes, had darker skin and were old. Vitamin D is produced in the skin as a reaction to ultraviolet light and it subsequently metabolised in the liver and kidneys to form “active” vitamin D.

Since then, numerous studies have unearthed a link between sunny lifestyles and reduced prostate cancer risk. But most researchers either relied on broad geographical trends or on subjects recalling specific memories of sun exposure. “The problem is that if you have disease, your recollection of things that might have affected your disease can be very biased,” Schwartz explains.

Sun on their faces

So Schwartz, along with a team led by Esther John at the Northern California Cancer Center in Union City, attempted to measure sun exposure objectively. They measured skin pigmentation of 450 white men with cases of advanced prostate cancer and compared them with 455 matched controls without the disease.

The team calculated the difference in skin darkness between each person’s forehead and their inner arm - an area that rarely sees sunshine. Recent research has suggested that the increased forehead pigmentation reflects a lifetime’s worth of sun, darkening with age.

They found that men with the darkest forehead - in relation to their inner arm - were 49% less likely to develop prostate cancer than those with the smallest increases in forehead pigmentation. Furthermore, the reduction in risk was even greater for those men who carried particularly “active” forms of the vitamin D receptor (VDR).

Cheap and easy

Richard Strange at Keele University, UK, also researches connections between prostate cancer and vitamin D. In a smaller group of British white men, he and his colleagues found that higher occupational sun exposure reduced risk. “Many of us now spend a very large part of our lives indoors. We don’t have high enough levels of vitamin D to protect against certain cancers,” he says. “The public health potential is enormous. Vitamin D is cheap and easy, either as supplements or as cautious exposure to UV. That’s got to be good news.”

But the benefits of UV on vitamin D levels must be balanced against its known skin cancer risks, warns Cancer Research UK spokesperson Henry Scowcroft. “For most people, it usually takes just a few minutes of sun-exposure for your skin to make a very large amount of vitamin D - much less time than it takes for the skin to burn or even redden. But exactly how long is needed will depend on skin type, age, location and time of day and year."

Schwartz advocates the use of dietary supplements, though optimal doses are unknown. While future controlled trials may resolve dosage issues, Schwartz suggests that men might as well increase vitamin D supplements now. “In the US there are 240,000 new cases of prostate cancer diagnosed each year. If you can do something that is safe and inexpensive, why not?”

Journal Reference: Cancer Research (vol 65, p 5470)

Friday, June 10, 2005

ZAMAN DAILY NEWSPAPER (2005061020545)

ZAMAN DAILY NEWSPAPER (2005061020545)
Painkillers with Ibuprofen Increase Heart Attack Risk
By aa
Published: Friday 10, 2005
zaman.com

Painkillers with ibuprofen are claimed to increase the risk of heart attacks by up to 24 percent.
The conditions of 9,218 patients between the ages of 25 and 100 were examined in research published on the British Medical Journal. Diclofenac is also found to increase the risk of heart attack 55 percent, celecoxib 21 percent and rofecoxib 32 percent, the research reveals.

Des cellules souches contre l'infarctus

Des cellules souches contre l'infarctus
Des cellules souches contre l'infarctus
Mise à jour le jeudi 9 juin 2005 à 16 h 44

Les cellules souches sont extraites de la moelle épinière puis injectées dans l'organe nécrosé.
Guérir les dommages causés par l'infarctus en utilisant des cellules souches. Voilà le pari que des chercheurs sud-coréens des universités Catholique et Chonbuk de Séoul estiment avoir remporté.
Ils ont injecté des cellules à 74 personnes qui avaient des lésions cérébrales engendrées par un infarctus (nécrose à la suite d'une diminution ou d'une interruption de la circulation sanguine).

Ainsi, l'emploi des cellules souches a eu un effet thérapeutique sur 64 patients, soit quatre personnes sur cinq.

Des patients qui n'étaient pas capables de communiquer avant la thérapie ont amélioré de manière significative leurs défauts d'élocution après.

Les chercheurs pensent que ce succès clinique efface les doutes sur la thérapie à base de cellules souches et ouvre la voie à son utilisation généralisée

Monday, June 06, 2005

The birds and the bees - Ouch!

The Sad Saga Of The Drone Bee

The plight of the male honey bee is one of the classic examples of sexual suicide. This incredible story is actually very complex and is eloquently explained by Mark Winston in his fascinating book The Biology of the Honey Bee (Harvard University Press, 1987). Honey bees are social insects that live in complex colonies. They have a division of labor with a true caste system in which different bees assume various roles within the colony. In fact, the way that all the thousands of individuals selflessly serve the collective is somewhat reminiscent of "The Borg" in Star Trek: The Next Generation. Compared with the smaller diploid female workers, the haploid drones have a relatively easy life--until that fateful day when they must fly into the sky for their rendezvous with a sexually receptive queen. The entire sex act takes place during flight, like a jet fighter refueling in mid air. Only in the case of honey bees, the actual bridge between the drone and the queen is his extended penis apparatus (endophallus) which is tightly plugged into the sting chamber of the receptive female. His explosive ejaculation ruptures his everted penis apparatus and propels semen into the queen's oviduct. In addition to the forceful ejaculation of semen, the terminal bulb at the tip of the everted endophallus remains in the queens vagina, and according to Mark Winston (1987), this "plug" may function to prevent semen from flowing out of the vagina following copulation. [So there is truth in the old tale about the drone's penis breaking off inside the female.] In the sci-fi film "Zzzzz" (a TV episode from the 1964 Outer Limits series), a queen bee metamorphosed into a women named Regina. In this "B" rated-film, Regina wanted to mate with the entomologist Ben Fields to produce a super race of bees. It is now very clear why the terrified entomologist/bee keeper did not want to have sex with this queen bee lady. Getting back to the world of real honey bees, the drone bee dies within minutes after his violent eruption of semen and literally falls from the sky.


With her sperm receptacle (called a spermatheca) filled, the queen can lay fertilized, diploid eggs (which become females) and unfertilized (haploid) eggs (which become males) in the hexagonal wax cells of her hive, in one of nature's truly amazing insect cycles. In case you are wondering, worker bees build unfertilized hexagonal cells a little larger in order to accommodate the drone. When full, the queen's spermatheca may contain more than five million sperm, more than enough to lay 1500 fertilized eggs daily during the summer, and up to 200,000 fertilized eggs annually during her life span of nearly four years. According to Mark Winston (1987), the queen may get a complete fill-up of sperm on one mating flight (often from more than one male), or she may make several flights over a period of several days to a week. And during the mating flight of one queen, up to 17 male drones may commit sexual suicide.

In a PBS TV broadcast about honey bees, the narrator referred to drone bees as "clones" of each other. Since clones are usually defined as genetically identical individuals (usually derived asexually), WAYNE'S WORD strongly disagrees with the accuracy of this broadcast. Although the haploid drone comes from an unfertilized egg with only one set of chromosomes, they are certainly not all genetically identical. The diploid queen bee undergoes normal meiosis (oögenesis) producing haploid eggs. During this cell division process her 16 pairs of homologous chromosomes become altered and reshuffled through crossing over and random assortment, resulting in haploid eggs that are not chromosomally identical. In fact, with 16 pairs of homologous chromosomes, there are 65,536 different chromosomal combinations possible. Furthermore, the additional random combination of gametes during fertilization also insures that worker bees are not chromosomally identical. One more gee whiz comment about honey bees. Since the foraging bees bring nectar back to the hive in special stomachs (where it is converted into honey and regurgitated into wax cells of their hive), honey is truly analogous to bee vomit.

New Scientist 11 steps to a better brain - Features

New Scientist 11 steps to a better brain - Features
Un article trop long mais très intéressant.
11 steps to a better brain
28 May 2005

You must remember this
It doesn't matter how brainy you are or how much education you've had - you can still improve and expand your mind. Boosting your mental faculties doesn't have to mean studying hard or becoming a reclusive book worm. There are lots of tricks, techniques and habits, as well as changes to your lifestyle, diet and behaviour that can help you flex your grey matter and get the best out of your brain cells. And here are 11 of them.

Smart drugs

Does getting old have to mean worsening memory, slower reactions and fuzzy thinking?

AROUND the age of 40, honest folks may already admit to noticing changes in their mental abilities. This is the beginning of a gradual decline that in all too many of us will culminate in full-blown dementia. If it were possible somehow to reverse it, slow it or mask it, wouldn't you?

A few drugs that might do the job, known as "cognitive enhancement", are already on the market, and a few dozen others are on the way. Perhaps the best-known is modafinil. Licensed to treat narcolepsy, the condition that causes people to suddenly fall asleep, it has notable effects in healthy people too. Modafinil can keep a person awake and alert for 90 hours straight, with none of the jitteriness and bad concentration that amphetamines or even coffee seem to produce.

In fact, with the help of modafinil, sleep-deprived people can perform even better than their well-rested, unmedicated selves. The forfeited rest doesn't even need to be made good. Military research is finding that people can stay awake for 40 hours, sleep the normal 8 hours, and then pull a few more all-nighters with no ill effects. It's an open secret that many, perhaps most, prescriptions for modafinil are written not for people who suffer from narcolepsy, but for those who simply want to stay awake. Similarly, many people are using Ritalin not because they suffer from attention deficit or any other disorder, but because they want superior concentration during exams or heavy-duty negotiations.

The pharmaceutical pipeline is clogged with promising compounds - drugs that act on the nicotinic receptors that smokers have long exploited, drugs that work on the cannabinoid system to block pot-smoking-type effects. Some drugs have also been specially designed to augment memory. Many of these look genuinely plausible: they seem to work, and without any major side effects.

So why aren't we all on cognitive enhancers already? "We need to be careful what we wish for," says Daniele Piomelli at the University of California at Irvine. He is studying the body's cannabinoid system with a view to making memories less emotionally charged in people suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder. Tinkering with memory may have unwanted effects, he warns. "Ultimately we may end up remembering things we don't want to."

Gary Lynch, also at UC Irvine, voices a similar concern. He is the inventor of ampakines, a class of drugs that changes the rules about how a memory is encoded and how strong a memory trace is - the essence of learning (see New Scientist, 14 May, p 6). But maybe the rules have already been optimised by evolution, he suggests. What looks to be an improvement could have hidden downsides.

Still, the opportunity may be too tempting to pass up. The drug acts only in the brain, claims Lynch. It has a short half-life of hours. Ampakines have been shown to restore function to severely sleep-deprived monkeys that would otherwise perform poorly. Preliminary studies in humans are just as exciting. You could make an elderly person perform like a much younger person, he says. And who doesn't wish for that?

Food for thought

You are what you eat, and that includes your brain. So what is the ultimate mastermind diet?

YOUR brain is the greediest organ in your body, with some quite specific dietary requirements. So it is hardly surprising that what you eat can affect how you think. If you believe the dietary supplement industry, you could become the next Einstein just by popping the right combination of pills. Look closer, however, and it isn't that simple. The savvy consumer should take talk of brain-boosting diets with a pinch of low-sodium salt. But if it is possible to eat your way to genius, it must surely be worth a try.

First, go to the top of the class by eating breakfast. The brain is best fuelled by a steady supply of glucose, and many studies have shown that skipping breakfast reduces people's performance at school and at work.

But it isn't simply a matter of getting some calories down. According to research published in 2003, kids breakfasting on fizzy drinks and sugary snacks performed at the level of an average 70-year-old in tests of memory and attention. Beans on toast is a far better combination, as Barbara Stewart from the University of Ulster, UK, discovered. Toast alone boosted children's scores on a variety of cognitive tests, but when the tests got tougher, the breakfast with the high-protein beans worked best. Beans are also a good source of fibre, and other research has shown a link between a high-fibre diet and improved cognition. If you can't stomach beans before midday, wholemeal toast with Marmite makes a great alternative. The yeast extract is packed with B vitamins, whose brain-boosting powers have been demonstrated in many studies.

A smart choice for lunch is omelette and salad. Eggs are rich in choline, which your body uses to produce the neurotransmitter acetylcholine. Researchers at Boston University found that when healthy young adults were given the drug scopolamine, which blocks acetylcholine receptors in the brain, it significantly reduced their ability to remember word pairs. Low levels of acetylcholine are also associated with Alzheimer's disease, and some studies suggest that boosting dietary intake may slow age-related memory loss.

A salad packed full of antioxidants, including beta-carotene and vitamins C and E, should also help keep an ageing brain in tip-top condition by helping to mop up damaging free radicals. Dwight Tapp and colleagues from the University of California at Irvine found that a diet high in antioxidants improved the cognitive skills of 39 ageing beagles - proving that you can teach an old dog new tricks.

Round off lunch with a yogurt dessert, and you should be alert and ready to face the stresses of the afternoon. That's because yogurt contains the amino acid tyrosine, needed for the production of the neurotransmitters dopamine and noradrenalin, among others. Studies by the US military indicate that tyrosine becomes depleted when we are under stress and that supplementing your intake can improve alertness and memory.

Don't forget to snaffle a snack mid-afternoon, to maintain your glucose levels. Just make sure you avoid junk food, and especially highly processed goodies such as cakes, pastries and biscuits, which contain trans-fatty acids. These not only pile on the pounds, but are implicated in a slew of serious mental disorders, from dyslexia and ADHD (attention deficit hyperactivity disorder) to autism. Hard evidence for this is still thin on the ground, but last year researchers at the annual Society for Neuroscience meeting in San Diego, California, reported that rats and mice raised on the rodent equivalent of junk food struggled to find their way around a maze, and took longer to remember solutions to problems they had already solved.

It seems that some of the damage may be mediated through triglyceride, a cholesterol-like substance found at high levels in rodents fed on trans-fats. When the researchers gave these rats a drug to bring triglyceride levels down again, the animals' performance on the memory tasks improved.

Brains are around 60 per cent fat, so if trans-fats clog up the system, what should you eat to keep it well oiled? Evidence is mounting in favour of omega-3 fatty acids, in particular docosahexaenoic acid or DHA. In other words, your granny was right: fish is the best brain food. Not only will it feed and lubricate a developing brain, DHA also seems to help stave off dementia. Studies published last year reveal that older mice from a strain genetically altered to develop Alzheimer's had 70 per cent less of the amyloid plaques associated with the disease when fed on a high-DHA diet.

Finally, you could do worse than finish off your evening meal with strawberries and blueberries. Rats fed on these fruits have shown improved coordination, concentration and short-term memory. And even if they don't work such wonders in people, they still taste fantastic. So what have you got to lose?

The Mozart effect

Music may tune up your thinking, but you can't just crank up the volume and expect to become a genius

A DECADE ago Frances Rauscher, a psychologist now at the University of Wisconsin at Oshkosh, and her colleagues made waves with the discovery that listening to Mozart improved people's mathematical and spatial reasoning. Even rats ran mazes faster and more accurately after hearing Mozart than after white noise or music by the minimalist composer Philip Glass. Last year, Rauscher reported that, for rats at least, a Mozart piano sonata seems to stimulate activity in three genes involved in nerve-cell signalling in the brain.

This sounds like the most harmonious way to tune up your mental faculties. But before you grab the CDs, hear this note of caution. Not everyone who has looked for the Mozart effect has found it. What's more, even its proponents tend to think that music boosts brain power simply because it makes listeners feel better - relaxed and stimulated at the same time - and that a comparable stimulus might do just as well. In fact, one study found that listening to a story gave a similar performance boost.

There is, however, one way in which music really does make you smarter, though unfortunately it requires a bit more effort than just selecting something mellow on your iPod. Music lessons are the key. Six-year-old children who were given music lessons, as opposed to drama lessons or no extra instruction, got a 2 to 3-point boost in IQ scores compared with the others. Similarly, Rauscher found that after two years of music lessons, pre-school children scored better on spatial reasoning tests than those who took computer lessons.

Maybe music lessons exercise a range of mental skills, with their requirement for delicate and precise finger movements, and listening for pitch and rhythm, all combined with an emotional dimension. Nobody knows for sure. Neither do they know whether adults can get the same mental boost as young children. But, surely, it can't hurt to try.

Bionic brains

If training and tricks seem too much like hard work, some technological short cuts can boost brain function

(See graphic, above)

Gainful employment

Put your mind to work in the right way and it could repay you with an impressive bonus

UNTIL recently, a person's IQ - a measure of all kinds of mental problem-solving abilities, including spatial skills, memory and verbal reasoning - was thought to be a fixed commodity largely determined by genetics. But recent hints suggest that a very basic brain function called working memory might underlie our general intelligence, opening up the intriguing possibility that if you improve your working memory, you could boost your IQ too.

Working memory is the brain's short-term information storage system. It's a workbench for solving mental problems. For example if you calculate 73 - 6 + 7, your working memory will store the intermediate steps necessary to work out the answer. And the amount of information that the working memory can hold is strongly related to general intelligence.

A team led by Torkel Klingberg at the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm, Sweden, has found signs that the neural systems that underlie working memory may grow in response to training. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) brain scans, they measured the brain activity of adults before and after a working-memory training programme, which involved tasks such as memorising the positions of a series of dots on a grid. After five weeks of training, their brain activity had increased in the regions associated with this type of memory (Nature Neuroscience, vol 7, p 75).

Perhaps more significantly, when the group studied children who had completed these types of mental workouts, they saw improvement in a range of cognitive abilities not related to the training, and a leap in IQ test scores of 8 per cent (Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, vol 44, p 177). It's early days yet, but Klingberg thinks working-memory training could be a key to unlocking brain power. "Genetics determines a lot and so does the early gestation period," he says. "On top of that, there is a few per cent - we don't know how much - that can be improved by training."

Memory marvels

Mind like a sieve? Don't worry. The difference between mere mortals and memory champs is more method than mental capacity

AN AUDITORIUM is filled with 600 people. As they file out, they each tell you their name. An hour later, you are asked to recall them all. Can you do it? Most of us would balk at the idea. But in truth we're probably all up to the task. It just needs a little technique and dedication.

First, learn a trick from the "mnemonists" who routinely memorise strings of thousands of digits, entire epic poems, or hundreds of unrelated words. When Eleanor Maguire from University College London and her colleagues studied eight front runners in the annual World Memory Championships they did not find any evidence that these people have particularly high IQs or differently configured brains. But, while memorising, these people did show activity in three brain regions that become active during movements and navigation tasks but are not normally active during simple memory tests.

This may be connected to the fact that seven of them used a strategy in which they place items to be remembered along a visualised route (Nature Neuroscience, vol 6, p 90). To remember the sequence of an entire pack of playing cards for example, the champions assign each card an identity, perhaps an object or person, and as they flick through the cards they can make up a story based on a sequence of interactions between these characters and objects at sites along a well-trodden route.

Actors use a related technique: they attach emotional meaning to what they say. We always remember highly emotional moments better than less emotionally loaded ones. Professional actors also seem to link words with movement, remembering action-accompanied lines significantly better than those delivered while static, even months after a show has closed.

Helga Noice, a psychologist from Elmhurst College in Illinois, and Tony Noice, an actor, who together discovered this effect, found that non-thesps can benefit by adopting a similar technique. Students who paired their words with previously learned actions could reproduce 38 per cent of them after just 5 minutes, whereas rote learners only managed 14 per cent. The Noices believe that having two mental representations gives you a better shot at remembering what you are supposed to say.

Strategy is important in everyday life too, says Barry Gordon from Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, Maryland. Simple things like always putting your car keys in the same place, writing things down to get them off your mind, or just deciding to pay attention, can make a big difference to how much information you retain. And if names are your downfall, try making some mental associations. Just remember to keep the derogatory ones to yourself.

Sleep on it

Never underestimate the power of a good night's rest

SKIMPING on sleep does awful things to your brain. Planning, problem-solving, learning, concentration,working memory and alertness all take a hit. IQ scores tumble. "If you have been awake for 21 hours straight, your abilities are equivalent to someone who is legally drunk," says Sean Drummond from the University of California, San Diego. And you don't need to pull an all-nighter to suffer the effects: two or three late nights and early mornings on the trot have the same effect.

Luckily, it's reversible - and more. If you let someone who isn't sleep-deprived have an extra hour or two of shut-eye, they perform much better than normal on tasks requiring sustained attention, such taking an exam. And being able to concentrate harder has knock-on benefits for overall mental performance. "Attention is the base of a mental pyramid," says Drummond. "If you boost that, you can't help boosting everything above it."

These are not the only benefits of a decent night's sleep. Sleep is when your brain processes new memories, practises and hones new skills - and even solves problems. Say you're trying to master a new video game. Instead of grinding away into the small hours, you would be better off playing for a couple of hours, then going to bed. While you are asleep your brain will reactivate the circuits it was using as you learned the game, rehearse them, and then shunt the new memories into long-term storage. When you wake up, hey presto! You will be a better player. The same applies to other skills such as playing the piano, driving a car and, some researchers claim, memorising facts and figures. Even taking a nap after training can help, says Carlyle Smith of Trent University in Peterborough, Ontario.

There is also some evidence that sleep can help produce moments of problem-solving insight. The famous story about the Russian chemist Dmitri Mendeleev suddenly "getting" the periodic table in a dream after a day spent struggling with the problem is probably true. It seems that sleep somehow allows the brain to juggle new memories to produce flashes of creative insight. So if you want to have a eureka moment, stop racking your brains and get your head down.

Body and mind

Physical exercise can boost brain as well as brawn

IT'S a dream come true for those who hate studying. Simply walking sedately for half an hour three times a week can improve abilities such as learning, concentration and abstract reasoning by 15 per cent. The effects are particularly noticeable in older people. Senior citizens who walk regularly perform better on memory tests than their sedentary peers. What's more, over several years their scores on a variety of cognitive tests show far less decline than those of non-walkers. Every extra mile a week has measurable benefits.

It's not only oldies who benefit, however. Angela Balding from the University of Exeter, UK, has found that schoolchildren who exercise three or four times a week get higher than average exam grades at age 10 or 11. The effect is strongest in boys, and while Balding admits that the link may not be causal, she suggests that aerobic exercise may boost mental powers by getting extra oxygen to your energy-guzzling brain.

There's another reason why your brain loves physical exercise: it promotes the growth of new brain cells. Until recently, received wisdom had it that we are born with a full complement of neurons and produce no new ones during our lifetime. Fred Gage from the Salk Institute in La Jolla, California, busted that myth in 2000 when he showed that even adults can grow new brain cells. He also found that exercise is one of the best ways to achieve this.

In mice, at least, the brain-building effects of exercise are strongest in the hippocampus, which is involved with learning and memory. This also happens to be the brain region that is damaged by elevated levels of the stress hormone cortisol. So if you are feeling frazzled, do your brain a favour and go for a run.

Even more gentle exercise, such as yoga, can do wonders for your brain. Last year, researchers at the University of California, Los Angeles, reported results from a pilot study in which they considered the mood-altering ability of different yoga poses. Comparing back bends, forward bends and standing poses, they concluded that the best way to get a mental lift is to bend over backwards.

And the effect works both ways. Just as physical exercise can boost the brain, mental exercise can boost the body. In 2001, researchers at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation in Ohio asked volunteers to spend just 15 minutes a day thinking about exercising their biceps. After 12 weeks, their arms were 13 per cent stronger.

Nuns on a run

If you don't want senility to interfere with your old age, perhaps you should seek some sisterly guidance

THE convent of the School Sisters of Notre Dame on Good Counsel Hill in Mankato, Minnesota, might seem an unusual place for a pioneering brain-science experiment. But a study of its 75 to 107-year-old inhabitants is revealing more about keeping the brain alive and healthy than perhaps any other to date. The "Nun study" is a unique collaboration between 678 Catholic sisters recruited in 1991 and Alzheimer's expert David Snowdon of the Sanders-Brown Center on Aging and the University of Kentucky in Lexington.

The sisters' miraculous longevity - the group boasts seven centenarians and many others well on their way - is surely in no small part attributable to their impeccable lifestyle. They do not drink or smoke, they live quietly and communally, they are spiritual and calm and they eat healthily and in moderation. Nevertheless, small differences between individual nuns could reveal the key to a healthy mind in later life.

Some of the nuns have suffered from Alzheimer's disease, but many have avoided any kind of dementia or senility. They include Sister Matthia, who was mentally fit and active from her birth in 1894 to the day she died peacefully in her sleep, aged 104. She was happy and productive, knitting mittens for the poor every day until the end of her life. A post-mortem of Sister Matthia's brain revealed no signs of excessive ageing. But in some other, remarkable cases, Snowdon has found sisters who showed no outwards signs of senility in life, yet had brains that looked as if they were ravaged by dementia.

How did Sister Matthia and the others cheat time? Snowdon's study, which includes an annual barrage of mental agility tests and detailed medical exams, has found several common denominators. The right amount of vitamin folate is one. Verbal ability early in life is another, as are positive emotions early in life, which were revealed by Snowdon's analysis of the personal autobiographical essays each woman wrote in her 20s as she took her vows. Activities, crosswords, knitting and exercising also helped to prevent senility, showing that the old adage "use it or lose it" is pertinent. And spirituality, or the positive attitude that comes from it, can't be overlooked. But individual differences also matter. To avoid dementia, your general health may be vital: metabolic problems, small strokes and head injuries seem to be common triggers of Alzheimer's dementia.

Obviously, you don't have to become a nun to stay mentally agile. We can all aspire to these kinds of improvements. As one of the sisters put it, "Think no evil, do no evil, hear no evil, and you will never write a best-selling novel."

Attention seeking

You can be smart, well-read, creative and knowledgeable, but none of it is any use if your mind isn't on the job

PAYING attention is a complex mental process, an interplay of zooming in on detail and stepping back to survey the big picture. So unfortunately there is no single remedy to enhance your concentration. But there are a few ways to improve it.

The first is to raise your arousal levels. The brain's attentional state is controlled by the neurotransmitters dopamine and noradrenalin. Dopamine encourages a persistent, goal-centred state of mind whereas noradrenalin produces an outward-looking, vigilant state. So not surprisingly, anything that raises dopamine levels can boost your powers of concentration.

One way to do this is with drugs such as amphetamines and the ADHD drug methylphenidate, better known as Ritalin. Caffeine also works. But if you prefer the drug-free approach, the best strategy is to sleep well, eat foods packed with slow-release sugars, and take lots of exercise. It also helps if you are trying to focus on something that you find interesting.

The second step is to cut down on distractions. Workplace studies have found that it takes up to 15 minutes to regain a deep state of concentration after a distraction such as a phone call. Just a few such interruptions and half the day is wasted.

Music can help as long as you listen to something familiar and soothing that serves primarily to drown out background noise. Psychologists also recommend that you avoid working near potential diversions, such as the fridge.

There are mental drills to deal with distractions. College counsellors routinely teach students to recognise when their thoughts are wandering, and catch themselves by saying "Stop! Be here now!" It sounds corny but can develop into a valuable habit. As any Zen meditator will tell you, concentration is as much a skill to be lovingly cultivated as it is a physiochemical state of the brain.

Positive feedback

Thought control is easier than you might imagine

IT SOUNDS a bit New Age, but there is a mysterious method of thought control you can learn that seems to boost brain power. No one quite knows how it works, and it is hard to describe exactly how to do it: it's not relaxation or concentration as such, more a state of mind. It's called neurofeedback. And it is slowly gaining scientific credibility.

Neurofeedback grew out of biofeedback therapy, popular in the 1960s. It works by showing people a real-time measure of some seemingly uncontrollable aspect of their physiology - heart rate, say - and encouraging them to try and change it. Astonishingly, many patients found that they could, though only rarely could they describe how they did it.

More recently, this technique has been applied to the brain - specifically to brain wave activity measured by an electroencephalogram, or EEG. The first attempts were aimed at boosting the size of the alpha wave, which crescendos when we are calm and focused. In one experiment, researchers linked the speed of a car in a computer game to the size of the alpha wave. They then asked subjects to make the car go faster using only their minds. Many managed to do so, and seemed to become more alert and focused as a result.

This early success encouraged others, and neurofeedback soon became a popular alternative therapy for ADHD. There is now good scientific evidence that it works, as well as some success in treating epilepsy, depression, tinnitus, anxiety, stroke and brain injuries.

And to keep up with the times, some experimenters have used brain scanners in place of EEGs. Scanners can allow people to see and control activity of specific parts of the brain. A team at Stanford University in California showed that people could learn to control pain by watching the activity of their pain centres (New Scientist, 1 May 2004, p 9).

But what about outside the clinic? Will neuro feedback ever allow ordinary people to boost their brain function? Possibly. John Gruzelier of Imperial College London has shown that it can improve medical students' memory and make them feel calmer before exams. He has also shown that it can improve musicians' and dancers' technique, and is testing it out on opera singers and surgeons.

Neils Birbaumer from the University of Tübingen in Germany wants to see whether neurofeedback can help psychopathic criminals control their impulsiveness. And there are hints that the method could boost creativity, enhance our orgasms, give shy people more confidence, lift low moods, alter the balance between left and right brain activity, and alter personality traits. All this by the power of thought.

Friday, June 03, 2005

BBC NEWS | Health | Toxins may pass down generations

BBC NEWS | Health | Toxins may pass down generations
Ces données rejoignent les études faites en Allemagne au début des années 90 sur des générations de mouches. Intéressant. Alarmant? Peut-être mais il faut aussi être conscient des capacités de détoxination des organismes vivants, en particulier lorsqu'on qu'on les aide avec des facteurs biologiques.

Toxins may pass down generations
Toxic chemicals that poisoned your great-grandparents may also damage your health, research suggests.
A team from Washington State University has produced evidence that some inherited diseases may be caused by poisons polluting the womb.

Research on rats suggests man-made environmental toxins may alter genetic activity, giving rise to diseases that pass down at least four generations.

The research is published in the journal Science.

The scientists exposed pregnant rats to two agricultural chemicals during the period that the sex of their offspring was being determined.

The compounds were vinclozolin, a fungicide commonly used in vineyards, and the pesticide methoxychlor.

Both are known as endocrine disruptors - chemicals that interfere with the normal functioning of reproductive hormones.

Rats exposed to the compounds produced male offspring with low sperm counts and poor fertility

They were still able to produce young, however. When these rats were then mated with females that had not been exposed to the toxins, their male offspring had the same problems.

The effect persisted through at least four generations, impairing the fertility of more than 90% of male offspring in each generation.

The researchers found the damage was not caused by alterations in the DNA code, but changes in the way the genes work.

These 'epigenetic' changes are caused by small chemicals that become attached to the DNA, modifying its activity.

Epigenetic changes have been observed before - but were not previously known to pass onto later generations.

Cancer clue

Lead researcher Dr Michael Skinner believes they may contribute to diseases such as breast cancer and prostate cancer.

We need to find out whether this trans-generational effect is translated to much lower doses
Professor Alan Boobis
Both diseases are becoming more common, and Dr Skinner says that cannot be down to genetic mutations alone.

The researchers believe their findings suggest exposure to environmental toxins may play a key role in the evolutionary process.

Evolution may not be driven entirely by genetic mutations, as commonly thought.

Dr Skinner said: "It is a new way to think about disease.

"We believe this phenomenon will be widespread and be a major factor in understanding how disease develops."

However, Dr Skinner stressed more work was needed to corroborate the findings.

The levels of chemicals the rats were exposed to were very high - much higher than people normally ever encounter.

Professor Alan Boobis, a toxicologist at Imperial College London, told the BBC News website the findings were interesting, but he said there was no need for people to be alarmed.

"This effect is likely to be concentration dependent, and these animals were exposed to very high levels of chemicals," he said.

"We need to find out whether this trans-generational effect is translated to much lower doses."

New Scientist Breaking News - Large study links power lines to childhood cancer

New Scientist Breaking News - Large study links power lines to childhood cancer
Large study links power lines to childhood cancer
Rien de nouveau. Au début des années 80, le Dr. Becker a déjà expliqué ce phénomène, mais personne ne le prenait au sérieux...
NewScientist.com news service
Gaia Vince
Children living near overhead power lines may have an increased risk of leukemia but the association may not be causal, UK researchers say.

The confusing message, which comes from the largest study to date - of over 29,000 children with cancer - is that since “there is no biological mechanism to explain the higher risk”, the results, “although statistically significant, may be due to chance”.

The study – a collaboration between the Childhood Cancer Research Group at the University of Oxford and National Grid owners, Transco – looked at cancer data in England and Wales between 1962 and 1995, for children aged up to 15 years old.

They were able to map how far each child lived from a high voltage overhead power line. Comparing the children who had cancer with a control group of 29,000 children without cancer but who lived in comparable districts, found that children whose birth address was within 200 metres of an overhead power line had a 70% increased risk of leukemia. Children living 200 to 600 m away from power lines had a 20% increased risk.

“To put these results in perspective, our study shows that about five of the 400 cases of childhood leukemia every year may be linked to power lines - which is about 1% of cases,” says Gerald Draper at Oxford University, who led the study. “The condition is very rare and people living near power lines should have no cause for concern.”

However, the results are controversial, coming just one month after the major UK Childhood Cancer Study report, which declared that there was no risk to children living these distances away from power lines.

“Statistical artefact”

Although a link between childhood cancer and power lines has been suggested by previous studies, it has only been associated with high exposure – those living within about 60 m of an overhead power line. At the distances Draper looked at, the electromagnetic field created by the power lines should be too low to have any health effects, he says. They were much lower, for example, than those constantly experienced due to the Earth’s magnetic field.

“We don’t think it is possible that a magnetic field of these low magnitudes could have a causative effect on childhood leukemia,” Draper says.

The increase in leukemia risk for those living at distances greater than 60 m was “difficult to interpret, but is most unlikely to be due to any residual electromagnetic field, or other exposures related to the power line”, says David Grant, scientific director of Leukemia Research. “It cannot be excluded that it is a statistical artefact.”

But given the statistical significance of their results, the researchers had considered other theories. One established link with the disease is low exposure to infection soon after birth - an effect seen most commonly in babies born to higher income, middle-class families, where early social mixing between infants is rarer. Draper’s group looked at the population characteristics in areas immediately surrounding power lines.

They found that some were built in areas of low income housing and others in high-income areas. Looking at social status data alone, there was a 10% increase in leukemia for those in middle-class families, but these results were found to be independent of power line location data.

Corona ions

Another theory that the researchers tested, first mooted controversially in 1999 by Dennis Henshaw at Bristol University, UK, concerned “corona ion” effects. Henshaw proposed that the air immediately surrounding a high voltage power line or pylon becomes ionised by the electric field.

Corona ions combine with pollutants in the air, giving rise to charged airborne particles, which may be blown some distance away before being inhaled. Henshaw believes that once breathed in, the particles remain in the lungs, causing cancer.

The researchers attempted to test this theory with Henshaw, and found no discernable difference between leukemia cases upwind or downwind of the power cables. However, they admit that the testing procedure, although the best available at the time, was poor. They are preparing to conduct a more conclusive test, with Henshaw’s newly devised equipment. He believes the excess number of children found to have leukemia due to power lines - five per year - “may be the tip of the iceberg”.

This paper forms part of Draper’s larger study, which is also looking at electromagnetic doses at different distances from power lines.

Journal reference: British Medical Journal (vol 330, p 1290)

Thursday, June 02, 2005

L'arsenic aurait bel et bien tué Napoléon

L'arsenic aurait bel et bien tuéNapoléon
Une vieille histoire qui remonte à la surface. L'intoxication par les métaux lourds n'est rien de nouveau. Du temps de Néron, on avait réussi à empoisonner tous les habitants de la ville avec la tuyauterie de plomb qui transportait l'eau potable. On dit que la neurotoxicité du plomb a grandement contribué au déclin et à la décadence de l'empire romain.

L'arsenic aurait bel et bien tué Napoléon

La controverse sur la mort de Napoléon n'en finit plus.
Les thèses voulant que l'empereur français soit mort d'une erreur médicale ou d'un cancer de l'estomac ne seraient pas exactes, selon le Dr Pascal Kintz.

Le toxicologue français soutient que le conquérant déchu serait bel et bien mort d'un empoisonnement à l'arsenic comme l'a prouvé l'analyse de ses cheveux en 2001.

Pour appuyer son hypothèse, il a mené des analyses de l'intérieur des cheveux de Napoléon, et non plus seulement de leur enveloppe capillaire.

M. Kintz vient à la conclusion que le poison a atteint la moelle épinière à partir du cheveu, ce qui implique qu'il a été poussé par le flux sanguin, et qu'il provient d'aliments ingérés.

La mort de l'homme d'État français alimente les conversations depuis plus de 40 ans.
Les cheveux de Napoléon présenteraient des concentrations en substance toxique de 7 à 38 fois supérieures à la dose « admise ».
Les détracteurs de cette hypothèse la rejettent habituellement en soutenant que l'arsenic détecté était d'origine exogène et n'avait pas été absorbé par l'empereur. Ils soutiennent que le composé toxique était communément utilisé au XIXe siècle pour conserver les cheveux.

D'autres chercheurs expliquent la présence du produit par la coutume des vignerons de l'époque de nettoyer leurs cuves avec cette substance et le goût de l'empereur déchu pour le vin.

Ce que réfutent les tenants de l'empoisonnement qui affirment que le type d'arsenic qu'utilisaient les vignerons n'était certainement pas dangereux pour la santé humaine.

En octobre 2002, le magazine Science rapportait que les travaux de trois scientifiques français prouvaient que Napoléon était mort d'un cancer de l'estomac lors de son exil à l'île Sainte-Hélène.

En juin 2001, l'équipe du Dr Pascal Kintz présentait les premières preuves qui appuyaient la thèse de l'empoisonnement de Bonaparte à l'arsenic. Ce sont des analyses de mèches de cheveux de Napoléon 1er qui révèlent la présence de doses anormales d'arsenic.

En août 1998, des chercheurs des universités d'Ottawa et de Yale affirmaient que Napoléon serait mort d'une erreur d'un médecin britannique, qui lui aurait administré un médicament riche en mercure.

Wednesday, June 01, 2005

Trust me, I'm spraying you with hormones

New Scientist Breaking News - Trust me, I%u2019m spraying you with hormones
Trust me, I’m spraying you with hormones
18:00 01 June 2005
NewScientist.com news service
Andy Coghlan
Giving people a whiff of a key chemical can make them more inclined to trust strangers with their cash, a new study reveals. Just three puffs of a nasal spray containing a hormone called oxytocin increased the chance that people would part with their money.

The research centred around a game in which an “investor” player gives part or all of his money on blind trust to an anonymous “trustee” player who earns interest on the combination of his own money and the invested sum. But the investor is told there is no obligation for the “trustee” to give any money back at all - they risk losing any money they choose to invest.

Michael Kosfeld at the University of Zurich, Switzerland, who led the study found that investors gave away their money far more willingly if they had sniffed oxytocin than if they had sniffed a placebo. But this extra willingness disappeared when the trustee’s role was computerised, rather than carried out by another human, confirming that the effect was interpersonal, and not simply a general willingness to gamble.

Overcoming shyness

Kosfeld speculates that the hormone reduces people’s aversion to betrayal, overcoming an unwillingness to initiate interaction with strangers. This matches observations in animal studies. “It helps animals to approach one another, which is a parallel with trust in our game,” he says.

Kosfeld’s team sees great potential for the hormone in the treatment of people who are excessively shy or withdrawn. “We’re hoping that if you use oxytocin as a companion to psychotherapy, it could have some positive effects,” he says.

But could it be used to con people? Kosfeld doubts it, because it takes nearly an hour for the hormone to reach the brain. Nor would it be easy to make people “sniff” something unfamiliar, and it is not known whether it would work through a spiked drink.

Oxytocin is more conventionally used to help induce labour in pregnant women and assist breastfeeding in mothers.

Journal reference: Nature (vol 435, p 673)